logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
수원지방법원 2013.08.21 2013노1902
국민체육진흥법위반등
Text

All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal against Defendant A is too unreasonable that the lower court’s imprisonment (two months of imprisonment, confiscation, and collection) and the lower court’s imprisonment (six months of imprisonment) against Defendant C is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. On March 26, 2012, Defendant A’s judgment on the assertion of unfair sentencing by Defendant A’s refusal to commit each of the crimes of this case, and the fact that Defendant A, while entering the court below’s joint Defendant B with Defendant B with Defendant B on March 26, 2012, changed the police officers who escorted B, and the police officers who were investigating B around March 27, 2012 were wrong. On March 29, 2012, Defendant A voluntarily surrendered to the police station by withdrawing from the police station to investigate each of the crimes of this case on March 29, 2012, and the fact that Defendant A agreed with the victim regarding the joint injury crime of this case, etc. are favorable to Defendant A.

On the other hand, Defendant A led the crime of violating the National Sports Promotion Act and gambling opening of the instant gambling site as a whole while opening and operating the instant illegal gambling site, and the degree of participation in the instant crime, such as committing the crime of violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, is considerably significant for the purpose of establishing a large passbook necessary for the crime. Defendant A’s violation of the National Sports Promotion Act and the crime of gambling opening is promoting excessive gambling to the general public, as well as promoting an excessive spirit of gambling to the general public, such as promoting illegal sports gambling, which is the most problematic issue, as well as hindering the fairness of the life of sports, and thus requires strict punishment. Defendant A’s joint injury crime of this case is highly poor in light of the circumstances and methods of the crime, and the parts and degree of the injury, as well as the degree of participation, and Defendant A has already been punished five times as the same crime of violating the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and the crime of injuring the injury (one-time suspended sentence and four times of punishment).