logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
대구지방법원 포항지원 2015.09.16 2015고단564
사기등
Text

[Defendant A, C, and D] Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and April, and imprisonment with prison labor for a period of eight months.

Defendant

B, E, F,.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

D On February 6, 2014, the Daegu District Court rendered a sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Fisheries Act at the port branch of the Daegu District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Daegu Prison on October 24, 2014.

1. Defendants A and F co-principaled Defendants: (a) forged a store lease contract to easily provide credit guarantee through a micro enterprise support system with a store lease contract, business registration certificate, etc. for the convenience of micro enterprises; (b) obtained a credit guarantee from the said foundation; and (c) offered loans from the said foundation to use them as living expenses, etc. for the sake of the convenience of micro enterprises.

On January 4, 2014, according to the above public offering, the Defendants forged private documents, stating the following: “The lessor, with respect to Q from the permanent residence in the border owned by the P, shall use the P, the lessee’s deposit amount, KRW 15 million for the lessee, and KRW 24 months from September 24, 2013 for the term of the lease” in the form of the real estate lease contract purchased in advance without authority for the purpose of exercising the O room 101 at the permanent residence in the border of North Korea, the dwelling of Defendant A, the residence of Defendant F, the lessee, and Defendant F, the term of the lease, was stamped back to the P, which Defendant F voluntarily sold.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to forge a real estate lease agreement in the name of P, a private document related to rights and obligations.

B. On January 6, 2015, the Defendants submitted the forged real estate lease contract to employees who could not know the forgery at the permanent residence of the Gyeongbuk-dong, which was located in the Gyeongbuk-dong, which was located in the Gyeongbuk-dong, from January 6, 2015 to apply for credit guarantee of the Gyeongbuk-do Credit Guarantee Foundation according to the above public offering as if they were duly constituted.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to exercise one copy of the forged real estate lease contract.

C. The Defendants’ fraud is based on the above conspiracy.

An employee whose name is not known at the time and place of entry in the paragraph shall be 20 million won at a financial institution.