beta
Text
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.
However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, the Defendants are above two years from the date of the judgment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. From September 2016 to September 2016, Defendant B, as indicated in paragraph 2, requested the Defendant A to “E’s release from attachment” in the manner of mutual consent, even if the obligee E did not obtain the consent to the attachment and collection order of the claim No. 3235 without obtaining the consent from the Daegu District Court Branch Branch of 2016, which was received by the obligee E with respect to the agricultural bank account under the name of the Defendant, and Defendant A conspiredd in the manner of mutual consent.
A. According to the above public offering of forgery of private documents, Defendant A entered “E,” “B, September 6, 2016,” “E,” “E,” “E,” and “E” in the date of preparation, and “E” in the column of the instant case with the Defendant’s house located in North-gu, North-gu, Ma-gu, and “E” indicated “325” and “E” in the Defendant’s column, the number of which was printed in “325” and “An obligor’s agricultural cooperative” in the Defendant’s name, the number of which was printed in the instant column, and signed and sealed “E” in advance, using the applicant’s name.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to exercise their rights and obligations, and forged a letter of application for the cancellation of seizure of claims and waiver of collection rights under the name of E, a private document.
B. According to the above public offering on November 3, 2016 at the event of the above investigation document, Defendant A sent one copy of the application for the cancellation of seizure and waiver of collection rights of forged claims by registered mail at the same post office at the volume of the same 3 Doo-ro, Nam-ro, Nam-ro, Yangyang-ro, Yang Sung-dong, the two times at port, and one copy of the application as described in paragraph 1(a). On November 4, 2016, Defendant A submitted the application as if he had been duly formed to an employee under the name of the Daegu District Court branch of the Daegu District Court.
As a result, the Defendants conspired with each other, in the name of E, a forged private document.