The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court (five years of imprisonment, etc.) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination is recognized as a favorable sentencing factor such as: (a) the Defendant was aged 72 (the Defendant asserts that he is 77 years of age); (b) around 1990, the wife and the deceased were separated and neglected; and (c) the health conditions were not good due to high blood pressure, suplicative loss, and fire extinguishing failure for a long time; (d) the number of crimes committed during the remaining period with the victim was only one time more; and (e) there was no history of having been punished for sexual crimes in the past.

However, the crime of this case is likely to seriously obstruct the victim and his family members from forming sound sexual values in the future. After having accessed the defendant's first place in the bus stop, the defendant was committed as if he was aware of the fact that he was able to do so and provided money over a long time, and the crime of this case was committed by inducing the victim to be surged and committing rape, and the crime of this case is highly bad and highly poor. The crime of this case is committed by the crime of this case, and the crime of this case is likely to cause damage to the victim and their family members, and the crime of this case seems to be committed by the court below. The defendant submitted a reflect on the facts charged after recognizing the facts charged, but the defendant was not able to fully deny the crime from the investigative agency to the court below to the court below, and the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor or punishment for the victim for more than 19 years since 10 years since 207, which was sentenced to punishment for the crime of this case (the crime of this case was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for more than 3 years since 197 years.).

As above, each of the above.