1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff’s status as a representative of the Plaintiff refers to the “C principal meeting” as the “B principal meeting” in 1925, and has been changed to the “B principal meeting.” The president D, the representative of the Plaintiff, has been in the absence of the Plaintiff from May 5, 2004 as the Plaintiff’s head.

B. During the dispute regarding the Plaintiff’s representative’s qualification (1) Some of the Plaintiff’s members filed a complaint against D on March 16, 2010 on the grounds that D had a problem in the doctrine of trust and committed various misconducts, and that D had committed various misconducts, and E Workers’ Association rendered a ruling to dismiss D on April 9, 2010.

Accordingly, ENo. 1 sent F on April 23, 2010 to the temporary president of the Plaintiff’s Council, and later sent G on December 20, 201, and Defendant H was dispatched around October 2014.

(2) On April 16, 2010, D appealed and appealed from the dismissal judgment of the EEU, and on August 5, 2010, D rendered a preliminary judgment that “The dismissal judgment of D and the dispatch of a provisional president are null and void, so D’s resignation shall be restored to its original state,” and reported it to the 95th general meeting held from September 27, 2010 to October 1, 2010.

(3) While F et al., dispatched to the Plaintiff’s temporary president, filed a provisional disposition application and lawsuit on the merits against D with a view to prohibiting access by the members of the general assembly against the Defendant, F et al. lost all of the above provisional disposition application and lawsuit on the merits on the ground that “D et al. recovered from its status as the president of the Plaintiff’s party by completing a valid procedure by which the general assembly of 95 general assembly did not confirm the intent of the members of the general assembly as to the judgment on the preliminary lawsuit against the Defendant and confirming the validity of the above preliminary judgment,” which became final and conclusive after the above decision and judgment became final and conclusive as they were.

(Supreme Court Decision 2013Da62018 Decided December 26, 2013). C.

It is related to the change of the union belonging to the plaintiff.