logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.02.13 2014고정1441
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From February 2, 2012 to February 2, 2013, the Defendant was found to have worked at “E” entertainment establishments operated by the victim D located on the fourth floor of the Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan City building C, and the name of the victim F, the wife of the victim D, was G.

On October 1, 2013, the Defendant: (a) at the Defendant’s office located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon; (b) on the part of the Defendant’s cell phone, the victim D; and (c) on the part of the victim D; and (d) on the part of the Defendant, the Defendant could be seen as having been registered as the Kakakao Stockholm-gu, Kakao Stockholm-gu; (b) on the part of the victim D; and (c) on the part of the Defendant, “Seoul-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul-gu, with the knowledge of one’s own licensing in the amount of KRW 3.5 million,” “Seoul-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul-gu, Seoul-gu, with the knowledge of one’s own licensing in the amount of KRW 4 million; and (d) on the part of Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul-gu, Seoul-gu, with the knowledge of one’s own licensing in the amount of KRW 3.5 million.”

However, the fact is that the victim D and F had stated the number of days of lending money from the defendant, but most of them stated in the indictment as "dub", but the victims are obligated to pay 5.4 million won to the defendant as of November 20, 2014 (see Supreme Court Decision 1 - Part 1 - Incheon District Court 2014Na6442), and they were corrected as "large part" and repaid.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the honor of the victims by divulging public false information through the information and communication network for the purpose of slandering the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (the statement on the fourth trial date);

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Evidence photographs;

1. Court rulings (2013Gaz. 108504), court rulings (2013Gaz. 64129) (203Gaz. 64129) and application of each Act and subordinate statutes

1. Article 70 (2) and Article 70 (2) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense;

arrow