logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.07.05 2016고단1874
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On June 3, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor due to forced indecent acts, etc. by Seoul Southern District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on March 11, 2016.

[2016 order 1874]

1. On May 3, 2016, at around 00:00, the Defendant who interferes with his/her duties is under the influence of Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “E” operated by the victim D (45 years and n) in Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, and the Defendant is under the influence of alcohol to demand the victim to return home after the end of his/her business and return home.

I see theme to report. I am I d. I am we see why there are other people, and why you have a funeral.

“The victim’s restaurant business was interfered with by force by putting two customers with the disturbance and avoiding the disturbance.”

2. The Defendant who interfered with the performance of official duties at the same place around 00:10 on the same day, and as seen above, listened to the police officer G on the Geum-cheon Police Station F District, G on the police officer G on the Geumcheon Police Station, who was called for late time from the police officer, and the police officer H on the same day, who was called to return home at the same place on the same day, with a large sound.

Chewing franchising theory, “G’s retail flag” was flaged by hand, and flaged by flabing and flabing the fat.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to 112 reported duties by police officers.

3. On August 31, 201, the Defendant violated the Act on the Protection and Observation of Specific Criminal Offenders and the Electronic Monitoring, etc. of Electronic Devices: (a) was subject to the Seoul Southern District Court’s decision to complete 120 hours of sexual assault treatment programs conducted at the five-year tracking device attachment order and the protective observation office due to forced indecent conduct; (b) commenced the attachment of a location tracking device from June 13, 2012; (c) on August 22, 2013, the Seoul High Court was sentenced to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Electronic Monitoring, etc. of Specific Criminal Offenders on February 1, 2014, and commenced the attachment of the tracking device on the same day; and (d) commenced on June 3, 2014 at the Seoul Southern District Court.

arrow