1. Attached 1. The real estate listed in the list shall be put to an auction and the remainder after deducting the auction cost from the price;

According to the evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3, the Plaintiff and the Defendants shared the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter “instant real estate”) according to the co-ownership ratio listed in the separate sheet No. 2.

In light of the overall circumstances revealed in the purport of the entire pleadings, such as the current status of the instant real estate, the position of the Plaintiff and the Defendants, and the circumstance leading to the claim for partition of co-owned property in this case, it seems the most impartial and reasonable division of the price through auction.

Therefore, the remaining amount of the instant real estate sold to auction and deducted the auction cost from the price shall be distributed to the Plaintiff and the Defendants in proportion to their co-ownership shares listed in the Schedule 2.

If so, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable and acceptable.