logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
광주지방법원 2018.05.02 2017가단516457
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The Defendants deliver to the Plaintiff each real estate listed in the separate sheet.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Defendants.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the claim against Defendant L

A. 1) On July 13, 2009, the Plaintiff, a housing redevelopment and rearrangement project association whose business area covers 52,749 square meters in Gwangju-dong-gu, Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu, has obtained authorization for the implementation of the project for the above business area from the head of the Dong-gu, Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu, and was publicly notified on the same day after receiving the application for parcelling-out from the members, and after receiving the application for parcelling-out on December 27, 2017.

【Grounds for Recognition】 The entries in items A through 9, 21, 22, 35, and 37, and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant has a duty to deliver the above real estate to the plaintiff who acquired the right to use and benefit from the above real estate in accordance with the public notice

The defendant's assertion that the management and disposal plan of the project of this case is not authorized, but there is no evidence to reverse the above recognition, and thus, the defendant's argument is rejected.

C. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant of this case against the defendant is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

2. Determination as to claims against the remaining Defendants

(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the reasons for the claims;

B. Based on Defendant B, C, D, E, F, G, J, K, and M: Defendant H, and I: Article 208(3)2 (a) of the Civil Procedure Act (a judgment made by a host of confession) of the Civil Procedure Act (a judgment made by a public notice) Article 208(3)3 (a) of the Civil Procedure Act