A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
[2013 Highest 2895]
1. On August 14, 2013, at D Hospital 612, which was located in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, around 01:30 on August 14, 2013, the Defendant stolen the amount equivalent to KRW 994,40, and the amount equivalent to KRW 865,440, the market price of Samsung Gggal-si, Samsung Ggal-si, which was set on the victim E and the victim F, who were hospitalized in the D Hospital, in order to charge the damages to the victim E and the victim F.
2. Around 01:30 on September 11, 2013, the Defendant: (a) at the H Hospital 201 sick room located in G in the same city, the victim I laid 99,000 won at the market price of one cellular phone 2 mobile phone in his/her possession and stolen the victim I by putting 99,000 won at the bed head of the bed.
[2013 Highest 3142] The Defendant posted a letter to Internet NeneberJ that he sells Nopt North Korea.
However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to sell goods.
Nevertheless, on December 5, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim K (22) who reported and contacted this paper on December 5, 2012, stating that “on the account number:L: account opened person:M transfer the price of the goods to the Agricultural Cooperative passbook (M), the Defendant will deliver the Nowon-do.”
In this regard, 50,000 won was remitted from the victim K to take property profits.
[2013 Man-Ma3191] On November 16, 2012, the Defendant sent a false statement to the victim O who visited the Defendant by accessing the Internet NAVV JV website by using a computer at the Gangseo-gu Seoul Ncom, Gangseo-gu, Seoul, to sell a mobile phone of 40,000 won, and reported it to the victim O who contacted the Defendant, and sent 40,000 won to the account transfer Sea of Account Transfer.
However, there was no intention or ability to send a cell phone to the victim even if the defendant receives the price because he did not have a cell phone.
The defendant deceivings the victim as such, and is a new bank in the name of the defendant on the same day from the victim.