logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
광주지방법원 2014.04.10 2014고단643
도로법위반
Text

The defendant is innocent.

Reasons

1. A’s violation of the restriction on vehicle operation on June 29, 2004 by an employee of the defendant specified in the facts charged, around 17:32;

2. Since the penal provisions applied to a summary order subject to review have retroactively lost effect according to the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality, the Defendant is acquitted in accordance with the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.