1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the following judgments, thereby citing it as is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Additional matters to be determined;

A. In-house director C, the representative of the Plaintiff’s assertion, made himself as the insured, and the Plaintiff as the policyholder, committed a breach of trust in setting excessive amount of insurance premium in light of the Plaintiff’s financial condition, and Defendant B had committed an act of actively taking part in the act of breach of trust, such as soliciting the conclusion of the insurance contract, etc., and Defendant B committed a tort by neglecting the procedure for identifying suitability, and at the same time, Defendant B was liable for the employer’s liability as the employer.

B. The evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize that Defendant B actively participated in the act of breach of trust against the Plaintiff by Defendant B, or that Defendant Company caused damage to the Plaintiff by neglecting the suitability identification procedure, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

3. The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed in its entirety as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in its entirety as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.