A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

From July 13, 2015 to July 29, 2015, the Defendant operated the key "C" as "C" in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju Building 520 from around July 13, 2015. The Defendant engaged in the act of arranging sexual intercourse by having D receive 80,000 won in cash from many unspecified customers who found the said business place, and by inducing D to take a scam of customers' sexual organ and scam.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (calculated additional charges);

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Order to attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act;

1. The basic area (referring to six months to four months of imprisonment) of the types of sexual traffic crimes subject to the age of 19 or more and the mediation, etc. of sexual traffic (referring to the mediation, etc. of sexual traffic due to the business, the giving and receiving of prices, etc.) under the scope of recommendations according to the sentencing guidelines;

2. Specific grounds for sentencing - the circumstance where the defendant reflects the crime of this case: the defendant has no record of being punished for any other crime except for a fine imposed once due to a drunk driving; and the defendant's business operation period is not a month. - The circumstances that occur due to the mediation of similar sexual acts are not considerable social harm, and it can be seen that D, a female sexual traffic, was ageed and caused a similar sexual act by the defendant.