1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The Plaintiff leased real estate owned by the Defendants and operated the niverse club, and paid KRW 40 million to the Defendants in return for the change of the business license name, and the above lease terminated, and the Defendants asserted that they are obligated to return the said money to the Plaintiff.

According to the overall purport of the statements and arguments in the evidence Nos. 1, 3, and 3, the Plaintiff leased a building from the Defendants on August 27, 2013, and operated the age club by several persons since around 1999, and operated the age club with the change of the name of permission for food service business. At the time of the Plaintiff’s lease of the building, E was in the business, and E was in the business, while changing the name of the business license to the Plaintiff, it is recognized that the Plaintiff received KRW 40 million from the Plaintiff through the Defendant B.

As such, the Plaintiff’s assertion is without merit, under the premise that the Defendants paid KRW 40 million to the Defendants, since the Plaintiff’s payment for change of business name is not E.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.