(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2013.12.18 2013고단328 (1)

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2013.12.18 2013고단328 (1)

상해

Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 22:10 on September 23, 2012, the Defendant, at the top of the Ccafeteria located in the Hadong-gun, Hanam-gun, the Defendant, even though she told the victim D that she would not have her her her her her her her her her her her her her her herths, continued to do so, she her her her her her her her herths with the Defendant’s head, her her her her her head, and her her her her her head, and her her her her her face was her her flad with his her her her her her her face, thereby causing an influe injury on the days of her treatment

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The dismissal part of the prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. On August 22, 2012, at around 18:30 on August 22, 2012, the summary of the charge of assault against Defendant A, the Defendant, in front of the F Service Office located in Hadong-dong, Hadong-dong, Hanam-gun, had the business owner directly place human resources in front of the F Service Office located in B, but there was a misunderstanding that the victim G had only female people who fit for mind and had the victim do work, and committed assault against Defendant A several times by putting the head of the female.

2. The judgment is the case that falls under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be punished against the victim's express intent under Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act. According to the written agreement submitted, the victim G can recognize the fact that the victim G withdraws his/her wish to punish the defendant after the prosecution of this case. Thus, this part of the prosecution is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

참조조문

유사 판례

-창원지방법원 진주지원 2013.06.05 2013고단328

-창원지방법원 진주지원 2019.12.05 2019고정87

-창원지방법원 진주지원 2014.05.15 2014고합7

-창원지방법원 진주지원 2014.10.23 2014고정256

-창원지방법원 진주지원 2016.04.28 2015고정653