logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2013.11.07 2012고단2404
사기
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On April 22, 2009, the Defendant, at the office of “SH” in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 3rd floor of the building in Songpa-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government, said, “The Defendant is in charge of the daily interest of the progress of the project with close relations with G, which is the distribution complex of the FF in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, which is newly constructed at the SH Corporation, and there is a contractual relationship with D, a design company at the G new site. It is also a design company at the G new site. The Defendant granted a store within the said G site, and issued all signboards and sprinks installed within the site through the SH Corporation and D’s cooperation, and changed 10% of the sales and 30 million won to the brokerage commission.”

However, there was no fact that the Defendant was in the same progress with G, and there was no contractual relationship with SH Corporation and D. At the time, G was uncertain at the time when G was sold, and there was no intention or ability to provide the victim with a store within G site or to provide the signboards and sponsers installed within the site with a monopoly.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received 30 million won from the victim immediately and acquired it by deceiving the victim.

2. According to the records of the board, D was in charge of the design work in G, and it appears that D had the authority to examine the wirs, signboards, etc. of the shop occupants in G, and as the victim, I, like the victim, stated in this court that “I would like to proceed with the business by making use of the wirs, not to think that the Defendant would have entered into a contract with SH Corporation, and would not be able to read the wirs and wirs, but to have no order to some extent,” and that E, the victim, also stated in this court that “I would have no means that the G store will be sold in gold, and there is a certain relationship with SH Corporation and D, and that I would be certain from itself.”

arrow