logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.12.16 2014구단31074
국가유공자 및 보훈보상대상자 등록요건비해당결정처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On January 23, 1969, the Plaintiff entered the Gun and was enrolled in the Gun on March 6, 1969 as the first term of the Korea Army Academy at the Army on March 6, 1969 and received a one-year course training (hereinafter “instant training”). However, on November 19, 1969, the Plaintiff was transferred to a general private soldier and was discharged from military service on December 31, 1971.

B. On December 2, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State (hereinafter “instant wounds”) on the basis of different applications.

C. After deliberation and resolution by the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement, on May 21, 2014, the Defendant rendered a decision on the Plaintiff’s non-conformity of persons who rendered distinguished services to the State and persons eligible for veteran’s compensation (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Grounds for recognition] Class A evidence Nos. 1, 3, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff was harsh in the course of undergoing the training of this case, and the plaintiff was forced to receive a strong shock during the course of the training, and even after being forced to face a strong shock, it was illegal for the defendant to take measures of this case on a different premise.

B. The facts of recognition (the result of this court’s request for the examination of medical records for the head of the Han River University Gangwon-do Hospital) are recorded only when he was enrolled in a dental course on the part of the beds, and it is not confirmed as to the cause of damage to the baby. 2) The Plaintiff was diagnosed at B Hospital as the care for the fright-hand side of the flachi, the flachi, the flachi, the flachi, the flachi, the flachi, the flachi, the flachi, the flachi, the flachi, the flachi, the flachi, the flachi, the flachi, the flachi, the flachi, the flachi, and the flachi

The plaintiff's diagnostic name can normally be treated as outpatients in dental services, and the time when the diagnosed symptoms have deteriorated shall not be confirmed at the place of beds.

3 Synasty may be considered as king, and ...

arrow