logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.07.02 2013고합270
강제추행등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 8, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 02:45, the Defendant: (b) calculated the drinking value at D cafeteria located in the wife population C; and (c) changed drinking again; (b) however, the victim E, who is the above restaurant operator, was in the end of the business and did not drink; (c) damaged the victim’s market value equivalent to KRW 231,00,00, the market value of which is the victim’s possession, by cutting off carbon, gas, cups, etc. on the table, which were used on the table, and cutting off the table by cutting off the table.

2. In the time and place mentioned in paragraph 1, the injured Defendant saw her son and her son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s her son’s son’s son’

As a result, the defendant suffered injury to the victim E, such as the left-hand side of the 14-day medical treatment, and the cerebral typ in need of medical treatment for about 21 days to the victim F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement to F and E;

1. A photograph of each damage;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports, investigation reports, and investigation reports (verification of destruction and damage of property);

1. Relevant Article 36 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the selection of each fine for the crime;

2. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

3. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

4. The reason for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the provisional payment order is that the Defendant, in a restaurant, demanded the victim to continue to be in the influence of alcohol or request the drinking in the state of drinking. However, as the Defendant refused to do so, violence in the course of drinking causes serious social problems and emphasizes severe punishment.

arrow