logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2014.10.14 2014고정439
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car in the Dora zone.

On March 13, 2014, the Defendant driven the said car with the blood alcohol concentration of 0.065% 0.065% around 22:13, the Defendant driven the said car, leading to the two-lane course from the direction of the luminous hospital to the sub-section 4-lane adjacent to the intersection of the Seoyangyang-si, Seoyangyang-si.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a vehicle has a duty of care to safely operate the steering system by accurately operating the steering system and the steering system of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of neglecting this, the Defendant, while stopping in the signal atmosphere at the same lane on the front side, shocked the part of the victim E (the 46-year-old driving) driving to the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle, and shocked by the shock, the said mae-car was driven by the victim G (the 35-year-old driving) driving while stopping the signal signal at the front, and led the h string to the front part.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by such occupational negligence, injury to the victim E, such as light salt, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, injury to the victim I (the 17-year-old age-old) who boarded the back seat of the said M& car, such as satisf, face satisf, etc. requiring medical treatment for about two weeks, and injury to the victim G, such as light satisf, tension, etc. requiring medical treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement to G and E;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. A report on detection of a host driver;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso of Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (8) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 148-2 (2) 3 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense (a point of driving while driving a motor vehicle);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37 and Article 38(1) of the Criminal Act are applicable;

arrow