(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.10.19 2016고단818

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.10.19 2016고단818

상해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 06:40 on February 14, 2016, the Defendant: (a) expressed the desire to “D” entertainment tavern located in Heak-gu, Seodong-gu, Cheongju-si, for the victim E (the 25-year age), who was seated next to the amusement entertainment restaurant without any particular reason while drinking alcohol; (b) taken the victim’s hand floor of hand, when taking the bath, such as “the clock and the string year”; and (c) taken the victim’s face on the spath of the spath; and (d) taken the victim’s face on the spath of the spath of the spath; and (d) taken the victim’s injury, such as brain spathy without any wife

Summary of Evidence

1. Witness E’s testimony (victim E) consistent with the witness testimony of the defendant 1. witness E (the victim) has consistently testified on the following facts: (a) the testimony of the above witness is specific and factual; (b) at the time the defendant settled 50,000 won by credit card separate from the drinking value to make the agreement to the victim; (c) such circumstance conforms with the witness testimony of the above witness; (d) in light of the place where the above case occurred, and the relation between the defendant and the victim, the defendant’s testimony is sufficiently consistent with the witness testimony of the above witness (the defendant merely acted to the victim to the extent that the victim would stick with the victim’s bath theory and the victim’s bath, and (e) the defendant’s testimony that the defendant tried to pay 50,000 won or agreed money to the victim as stated on the facts of the crime was not obtained, and (e) the victim’s injury to the victim and the witness’s testimony to the extent that the witness’s testimony is sufficiently consistent with the witness testimony of the above 1.

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Detention at a workhouse;

참조조문

-형법 제257조 제1항

유사 판례

-청주지방법원 2018.07.27 2016노1333

-청주지방법원 2016.05.04 2016고정96

-청주지방법원 2016.11.02 2016고정307

-청주지방법원 제천지원 2016.02.04 2015고단628

-청주지방법원 2016.03.23 2015고정943