Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Punishment of the crime

On May 6, 2016, the Defendant had a drinking in the room of male members of the elderly male household in C apartment house in Southyang-si around 17:00.

The victim D has been seated on the agenda, and the defendant got the victim, and the defendant towards the victim, "The former elderly president is flicking the dog and flicking the flick, and the flicking flick flick flick flick flick flick flick."

“The victim was openly insulting from among 3 to 4 senior citizens members.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Partial statement of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 311 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment

1. On September 4, 2015, the Defendant entered around 20:30 around September 4, 2015, and entered the family room of the elderly housing C.

A victim D has been only women at latest at night due to the fact that it occurred in the victim D's agenda.

"A sound, however, the Defendant committed indecent acts that make the victim feel a sense of sexual humiliation by using her sel and the victim her sel while leaving the victim her sel with her sel, leaving the victim her sel, and her burb with her her sel, etc.

2. There are statements in the victim D's investigative agencies and this court, which correspond to the facts charged in this part of the judgment, and the above statements are hard to believe in light of the following circumstances.

① 피해자는, 피고인이 공소사실 기재와 같이 피해 자를 뒤에서 껴안고 손으로 가슴을 만지면서 발기된 성기를 피해 자의 엉덩이에 비볐다고

statement is made.

However, F, which prepares a written statement supporting the victim's complaint at the victim's request, was that the defendant was spared by facing the victim in front of the victim and sparing the victim.

statement is made.

On the other hand, the defendant was born more than 10 years prior to his her birth, and "the defendant is her her son who suffered the sexual organ."