logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.09.08 2017고정216
도시및주거환경정비법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 900,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the implementer of the reconstruction project, as the president of the Housing Reconstruction Association, only H apartment 8 and 9 complex in light of light life.

1. Where a person who owns members, land, etc. requests perusal or reproduction of documents and related materials concerning the implementation of rearrangement projects, the chairperson of the promotion committee or the project implementer shall comply with such request within 15 days;

Nevertheless, on March 23, 2016, the Defendant received an application for perusal and duplication of the written resolution on the election of the president of a cooperative implemented around March 3, 2016 from K with the authority delegated by J as a member of the said union at the office of the above reconstruction association on or around 15, 2016. The Defendant received an application for perusal and duplication of the written resolution on the rearrangement project in the name of J, which entered the content of application for perusal and duplication of the written resolution on the election of the president of the cooperative implemented around March 3, 2016 from K, and even if he received a letter of delegation from K, the Defendant did not allow K to peruse and duplicate the said written resolution within 15 days thereafter, even if he/she received the letter of delegation from the above office.

2. The chairperson of a promotion committee or the project implementer shall make public the documents and related data concerning the implementation of a rearrangement project along with the Internet and other methods within 15 days from the date on which such documents and data are prepared or changed so that the members, landowners, or tenants can know them;

Nevertheless, the Defendant:

A. A. Around March 7, 2016, around the foregoing office, the official text sent to construction-related construction-related construction company to the public by the Internet and other means within 15 days was not disclosed simultaneously;

B. Around April 15, 2016, a lease agreement drawn up at the above office was not disclosed simultaneously with the Internet and any other means within 15 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of K witness, and the legal statement of L part of the witness;

1. A written request for information disclosure;

1. According to the official document, office lease agreement (i.e., witness K, L’s statement, etc.), the defendant is a member.

arrow