logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.05.02 2017가합585323
손해배상청구의 소
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 10,000,000 as well as the annual rate of KRW 5% from November 1, 2017 to May 2, 2019 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant related to the parties is an educational foundation that operates a graduate school of the D University, which is a new school under C religious organizations (hereinafter “instant religious order”). The Plaintiff passed a field of robbery after graduating from the D University graduate school and passed a field of robbery (g) in around 199.

B. (1) On February 22, 2010, the Plaintiff entered into the instant employment contract with the Defendant, and the Plaintiff, from February 22, 2010 to February 21, 2012, 201, shall be deemed as the Plaintiff’s construction training center at the D University New School from D University (hereinafter “Seoul High School Training Center”).

(2) The term “instant employment contract” refers to the term “instant employment contract” as set forth in item (g).

1. The sub-section 18 (the sub-section 18) shall assist the Chief of the Gyeong training Center and take charge of the following affairs:

(a) Affairs related to lectures, training, and worship;

(b) the field of light training for new students (credit management/special lecture/report submission, etc.);

(c) Other affairs related to the overall counseling and guidance for students and light training in regular courses;

(d) Overall control over the overall administration of a school bath room;

2. Sources belonging to the living center;

(a) Affairs related to the distribution of new walls, tools, and demand therefor;

(b) Life counselling (including student counseling);

(c) Affairs related to the overall training for housing in dormitories, such as a house, villa, and Do council;

D. General affairs related to the overall administration of the living hall. 2) According to the “Rules on the Franchising Franchising Franchising Franchising Franchising Franchising Franchising Franchising Franchising Franchising Franchising Franchising Franchising Franchising Franchising Franchising Franchising Franchising Franchising Franchising (Article 3), the Plaintiff continued to work as Franchising Franchising Franchising Franchising Franchis, etc. (Article 3), upon the renewal or renewal of the instant employment contract, the Plaintiff continued to work as Franchising Franchi

arrow