logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.01.20 2016고정2294
폭행
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is a person with no certain occupation.

On June 1, 2016, around 10:40 on June 1, 2016, the Defendant was waiting to talk with the new father in front of the room of the sexual watch in Daegu Northern-gu C.

Although the defendant put a new father before the defendant's office, the new father moved the defendant to another place where the defendant was damaged.

Although the Defendant discovered and driven away from a new body moving to another place where he was damaged, the Defendant committed an assault on the ground that the victim E (Woo, 76) who observed it was obstructed by blocking the new body.

2. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts charged for judgment: Judgment dismissing a public prosecution to submit a written agreement that indicates the victim's intention not to punish after the prosecution under Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act (Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act).

arrow