Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

[2017 High 2690] The Defendant, on October 23, 2016, has access to “C Official website” operated by the victim B through the Internet and has access to “D” a doctoral degree in the Philippines.

Where and in the same manner, on January 28, 2017, the comments on “Sark University”, and on the same manner, on January 28, 2017, the “Wark Doz” refers only to the person who is another person of the same veterinarian’s flab.

The article posted the comments on “this garbage must be” and publicly insulting the victims.

Around October 23, 2016, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by posting an article of “F” in the article of “F”, “after having access to the Internet, where a remote doctor’s degree is heard at any university of the Philippines,” on October 23, 2016 at the residential area located in the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E, 120 Dong 101.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 High 2690"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. The 2017 Highest 2691;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Complaint;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes by capturing the NAV news articles;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;