beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On July 31, 2014, at around 20:40, the Defendant visited 'C Zone B' while drunk and Handphones in Spocheon-si B, the Defendant continued to fluencing the Defendant’s books of duty and handphones into the front line for civil petitioners. “When the front box is located, the front box was fluored, and the inner face memory was fluored, and the Defendant was fluored by D while serving in the situation at the time when he was faced with the disturbance. As D, the Defendant continued to flucing the Defendant, such as: (a) whether the police officer was working for the police officer; (b) whether he was fluor; (c) whether he was fluored with the tax paid by him; (d) whether he was fluor; and (c) whether he was fluord with the voice that he was fluorous, and that he was fluord with the body of the D’s body that attempted to commit the Defendant.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers.
Summary of Evidence
1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;
1. Statement of D police statement;
1. E statements;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;
1. The relevant legal provisions on criminal facts, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act on the choice of punishment, the reason for sentencing of sentence [the scope of recommendation] for the obstruction of performance of official duties, the basic area (six to one year and four months) [the choice of sentence] for the obstruction of performance of official duties, not only is a very serious crime, but also a crime committed in light of the defendant's attitude of the crime in this case, it is inevitable to punish the defendant with prison labor.
In addition, the sentence shall be determined as ordered in consideration of all kinds of sentencing conditions imposed on the defendant, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, and circumstances after the crime, including the fact that the defendant was not present at court.
It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.