Defendant

A Imprisonment of 10 months, Defendant B’s imprisonment of 8 months, Defendant C, D, and E shall be punished by imprisonment of 6 months, and Defendant F.

... 뭐 CI씨다, 뭐 CJ씨다 뭐, 뭐뭐, 다 보내고 *** 뭐, 뭐 내 이름으로도 못 보내고.

Such a so doing ***** He does not have sent in his own name - F: so we have to do so, that we have to do so, which will eventually help in election, -A so that you have to do so: such - which you have to do so.**. But we have not been able to do so in good faith ***** even if we have come to know about the fact that we have done in trust.

This idea was presented.

We have been aware of internal expression ********: -F, we now have been in contact with this person and for several years, it cannot be said that we have lent the ticket by being sealed with his hand.

-A : 그런데, 그런데 내가 가지고 있는 네트워크 ***, 조직이 아무리 허술하게 봐도 우리 조직이 가지고 있는 네트웍이 있는데 -F : 예, 그런데 그때는 그거 저기 그 후보님이 그때 *** 줬을 적에 CI씨 *** 다 내, 내 *** 아, 그러면 빼입시다 하고 빼버리듯이 서로 간에 겹치고, 내가 그거 후보님의 정보를 모르다

-A - At all times, I will continue to observe.

(B) As to this, Defendant A asserts that ① the tape in which the above conversation was recorded was intentionally fabricated by extracting only the parts favorable to him, and ② himself was in the telephone call with another person at the time of the above conversation, and that he was only in a dry answer without seeking a proper consideration without any interest in the horses of F.

As to the first argument, the following circumstances recognized by each evidence of this case, i.e., ① the F appears to have recorded the conversations with a tape recording device, and this appears to fall under a relatively lower recording method in today’s high-level development of recording technology, and the prosecution is also included in the above recording tape.