logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.01.30 2017고단4285
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 20, 2017, the Defendant, “285, 2017 Highest 4,285,” connected to “Internet Game Site,” at any PC room located in the Dong-dong, Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and sold the game money amounting to KRW 40,000,000.

“A false statement” was made.

However, in fact, the defendant was merely intended by the victim to receive only money from the victim to use it for living expenses, etc., and did not have the intent or ability to sell the game money to the victim.

The defendant received 40,000 won from the damaged person to the corporate bank account of the defendant as the price for the same game money on the same day.

In addition, the Defendant, from around that time to September 10, 2017, received 43 times in total as shown in the attached Table 1 list of crimes, by deceiving the victims by the foregoing methods in the mutual influence room in the Dong-dong, Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government or the Dobong-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and acquired 4,832,100 won in total.

On September 2, 2017, the Defendant, “2017 Highest 5084,” connected the Internet game site “Stoptop” at any PC located in the Dong Dong-dong, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, by deceiving the victim D as if he did not have any intent or ability to sell the game money, and by deceiving the victim D as if he sold it, and by deceiving the victim to the IBK Bank account in the name of the Defendant on the same day from the victim to the IBK bank account in the name of the Defendant on the same day.

"2017 Highest 5224"

1. On August 24, 2017, the criminal defendant against the victim E sells the victim E with “2.3 billion won Meet game money in the PC room located near the entrance of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, via “the Internet game site”.

“In doing so, the remittance of money was demanded.”

However, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to send game money.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and on the same day, the corporate bank under the name of the defendant against the victim.

arrow