logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 영동지원 2016.04.14 2015고정60
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Attached Form

As stated in the list of the facts charged.

Since all charges are recognized, Article 4 of the established rules on the appropriateness of the method of preparing written judgments (re-type 2014-1) shall apply.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on a contract for trading equipment and a copy of passbook;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act comprehensively including the relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for a crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to the order of provisional payment reaches KRW 1,2980,000 for damage caused by the instant crime.

The victim is still punished for the defendant because the defendant was unable to receive a letter from the victim.

The defendant has already been punished several times due to the crime of this type of crime, has been sentenced to a fine in 2001 due to the crime of the same type of crime, and has been sentenced to a punishment in 2004, who has been sentenced to a suspended sentence for 5 years in 2004.

However, the defendant was committed by committing the crime of this case and his mistake is divided.

Some of the circumstances in which efforts have been made for the recovery of damage are observed.

Until now, there was no criminal records of punishment imposed on the defendant heavier than suspended sentence.

In addition, the existing level of punishment for the cases similar to the sentencing conditions revealed in the trial process of this case shall be determined as per the disposition in consideration of the two cases.

arrow