logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.01.18 2016고단6803
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 21, 2016, the Defendant damaged the said vehicle’s repair cost of KRW 725,000, which is the victim’s possession, by breaking a string door of the back-side of the driver’s seat of the E rocketing car in front of the CM car in the CM on September 21, 2016, where the victim D is driving.

2. On September 22, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was arrested at the G District Suspect's atmosphere room in the Jinsung-dong Police Station G District in the G District in the Jinsung-dong Police Station in the G District in the G District in the G District in the G District in the G District in the G District in the G District in the Jinsung-dong Police Station in order to stop the flusing and assault the Defendant at one time to walk the H's right-hand bucks.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on crime prevention, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police with H and D;

1. Investigation report (to listen to a statement by a police officer H telephone);

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged vehicles and CCTV caps;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties);

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Whether the Defendant was physically and mentally handicapped under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act at the time of committing the crime, but it is not deemed that the Defendant had no or weak ability to discern things or make decisions due to drinking at the time of committing the crime in light of the situation at the time of committing the crime, the Defendant’s words and attitudes at the time of committing the crime.

arrow