A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

[2016 Highest 2460] On May 21, 2016, the Defendant stolen a gap of the victim E-owned market value of KRW 280,000,000, which was located at the second floor D event site in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

[2016 Highest 2493] On May 29, 2016, the Defendant stolen goods worth KRW 235,600,000, total market price, including one head, four mobilephones, three telephones, five telephones, nine head watches, three 300,00, which were displayed at a different place in the G-based 1st floor H store located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

Summary of Evidence

[2016 Highest 2460]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A E-document;

1. Records of seizure, lists of seizure and photographs of seized articles;

1. CCTV photographs at the scene of occurrence, photographs of escape routes after committing the crime, and photographs of front lines prior to committing the crime of the suspect;

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement prepared in the I;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seized articles and photographs thereof;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (or CCTV counter-investigation);

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Grounds for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes;

1. The scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines for the crimes falling under Category I (2016No. 2460) [the scope of recommending punishment] and the scope of final sentencing due to the aggravation of punishment for the general property by the majority who are not subject to punishment: April to March 13, 200

2. Determination of sentence: Each of the crimes of this case committed by the defendant in April, who has been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the same place, even though the defendant was in the period of suspension of execution due to a crime of the same method, and has been committed twice consecutively.