See Attached List of Plaintiffs (Law Firm Inju, Attorneys Kim Jong-soo et al., Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

Republic of Korea (Law Firm Corporation, Attorneys Exclusively)

July 23, 2015

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2012Guhap42991 decided October 23, 2014

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The part of the judgment of the court of first instance is revoked. The defendant shall pay to each of the plaintiffs the amount indicated in the column for “claim amount” in the annexed list of plaintiffs, as well as 5% per annum from September 1, 2012 to the judgment of the court of first instance, and 20% per annum from the next day to the date of full payment.

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning for this Court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except for the deletion of the part of “B, as seen earlier, the duty on duty is a duty that can be replaced by a home-based service,” and therefore, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiffs' claims in this case are all dismissed due to the lack of reasons, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and all appeals of the plaintiffs are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

[Attachment]

Judges Lee Jong-soo (Presiding Judge)