The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant gets a small amount of alcohol at the Singu, Singu, Singu, Sing-dong, Singu, Singu, Singu, Singu, after drinking a small amount of alcohol at the defendant's parking lot and driving the defendant's franchise, and there is a lot of time for the defendant's promise with the Gulri-si, which remains after parking in the above street parking lot after getting off the automobile trial operation and subtracting the height from the speed. The defendant's judgment of the court below convicts the defendant of the charges of this case based on the credibility of the charges of this case, which affected the conclusion of the judgment, although the defendant's blood alcohol concentration at the time of driving the above vehicle did not reach the degree of 0.131% among blood alcohol level at the time of driving the vehicle, which affected the conclusion of the judgment of the judgment of the court below.

2. Determination

A. First, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the defendant was found to have been guilty of driving alcohol, such as drinking, on September 2, 2014, on the road located in Gui-si in Gui-si, on the road located in Gui-si; ② around 17:45 of the same day to 17:55 of the same day, the defendant was seated in the driver’s seat while parked in the above street parking lot; ② around 17:5 of the same day, the parking manager E and the parking fee were found to have been found to have been found to have been suspected of driving alcohol on the ground that the police officer was in the vicinity of the patrol, and the defendant was found to have been suspected of driving alcohol on the part of the defendant's entrance at around 18:21 on the same day, and had been investigated to have 10% of alcohol level among the blood alcohol level measured by the drinking alcohol measuring method; and the defendant was investigated to have 10:10 on the same day.