logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2014.04.02 2014고정142
도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 18, 2013, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluence of the measurement) and the Defendant was demanded to comply with the measurement of drinking alcohol by inserting the fluence distance road into a drinking-free measuring instrument over about 30 minutes on the ground that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was driving under the influence of alcohol by drinking the fluence vehicle while driving the fluence vehicle B while drinking the fluence road in a fluence fluence and driving the fluence vehicle under the influence of drinking.

Nevertheless, the defendant refused to take a drinking test and failed to comply with a police officer's request for a drinking test without justifiable grounds.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is engaged in driving automobiles by re-regulation.

As above, the Defendant, while driving a vehicle with drinking alcohol and driving the vehicle at the same time, became effective one-lane road in front of the filial length of the filial length located at the Seopo-dong at the Seopopopo-dong, but the Defendant, from the Roman to the Simart elementary school to the left left right at the speed of the city and passed the intersection where traffic is not controlled.

In such cases, the driver of any motor vehicle who intends to make a left-hand turn shall have the duty of care to prevent accidents by giving the right of way to the other motor vehicle, if any.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to turn to the left as it is.

On the other hand, the front part of the E-Wed vehicle operated by the victim D (Nam, 29 years of age) who was a direct dust in the direction of the proceeding was shocked by the front part of the E-Wed vehicle.

As a result, the defendant's negligence in the course of business to inflict bodily injury on the victim such as salt, tension, etc., which requires two weeks of treatment, and to the victim F (V, 4 years of age) who boarded the damaged vehicle.

arrow