beta
Text
1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The parties, etc. 1) The defendant is a corporation established for the purpose of software development, sale, lease, etc., and D is the defendant's representative director. 2) The E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "Nonindicted Company") is a company established for the purpose of software development, sale, etc., and the plaintiff is a representative director of the non-party company and a shareholder holding 800 percent of the defendant's total issued shares (20 percent of shares).
B. On September 207, 2007, the Plaintiff proposed that D should develop a computer program for a veterinary hospital, and D should take charge of sales and customer management. Since D established the Defendant on October 19, 2007 and appointed it as the representative director. On December 11, 2007, the Plaintiff established the non-party company and appointed it as the representative director. 2) D developed each program listed in subparagraphs 1 and 2 of [Attachment 2] of [Attachment 2] at the request of the Plaintiff on January 2008 and provided it to the Plaintiff on February 2, 2008, and thereafter provided the program listed in paragraph (3) of the same Table (hereinafter “program 1, 2”) to each of the Plaintiff on each of the instant programs.
3) On February 21, 2010, D, the Defendant, and F completed the registration of a copyright with respect to the program 1 and 3 as a joint author (D’s share 8/10, Defendant, and F’s share 1/10). Since then D and the Defendant completed the registration of a copyright with respect to the program 2 as a joint author (D’s share 9/10, Defendant’s share 1/100) on September 21, 201 (hereinafter collectively referred to as “each of the instant copyright”).
(c) The registration has been completed. (c) A dispute between the Plaintiff and D arising between the Plaintiff’s side and D regarding the reversion of each of the instant copyright between the Plaintiff’s Defendant and D. As the dispute arises between the Plaintiff’s side and D regarding the reversion of each of the instant copyright.