logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.08.09 2017가합11492
계약무효확인 등
Text

1. Each insurance contract entered into between the Plaintiff and the Defendant in the annexed Form 1 “Indication of an insurance contract” is null and void.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On March 9, 2007 and June 3, 2008, the Plaintiff entered into the instant insurance contract with the Defendant as the insured, each insurance contract listed in the separate sheet No. 1, stating that the Defendant would pay allowances for hospitalization for injury or disease, and a fixed amount of diagnosis money for a specific injury or disease to the insured (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant insurance contract”). The insurance contract listed in the separate sheet No. 1, and the insurance contract listed in Paragraph 2, stated in the separate sheet No. 2, “the instant insurance contract” (hereinafter referred to as “instant No. 2 insurance contract”). B. The Defendant received the payment of the insurance money under the instant insurance contract from November 5, 2010 to November 18, 2010 to KRW 3, 19, 2000, 19, 19, 19, 19, 19, 200, 200, 300, 300, 19,000.

C. From September 6, 1995 to December 29, 2016, the Defendant concluded a total of 56 insurance contracts with the Defendant including the Plaintiff as the insured as shown in the [Attachment 3] Total List of Insurance Contracts. At the time of entering into the instant First Insurance Contract, the total of 25 insurance premiums including the instant First Insurance Contract was 24 items, and the total of 1,567,99 won, and the total of 33 insurance premiums including the instant Second Insurance Contract, which were maintained at the time of entering into the instant Second Insurance Contract, are 32 items, and the total of 2,214,043 won, including the instant Second Insurance Contract, is 2,87,202 won, and the total of the insurance premiums currently borne by the Defendant is equivalent to 2,214,043 won.

2. The defendant is based on each of the above insurance contracts.

arrow