logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.04.29 2014가합28173
소유권확인
Text

1. The Defendant confirmed that the Plaintiff is the owner of the area of 1,590 square meters prior to Cheongju-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu.

2. The plaintiff's remaining claims.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Each real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each real estate of this case”) is a real estate in which all real estate listed in the separate sheet is unregistered. The forest land listed in the separate sheet No. 1 is “the forest of this case” and the land listed in the separate sheet No. 2 “the land of this case”).

B. 1) The owner column of the old forest register prepared with respect to the forest of this case is registered as the owner whose address is “D” on September 1, 1930 the ownership of the forest of this case was transferred by the first owner on September 11, 1930 (However, the above forest register does not contain any other information that could specify his personal information, such as the date of birth, in addition to the address of “D”.

2) On December 23, 1912, E indicated as “D” is registered as the owner’s column for the old forest land prepared with respect to the instant land.

C. Meanwhile, upon the Plaintiff’s death on March 11, 1942, E (E, the birth in 1876) succeeded to the entire property of the above E as the family heir, and as the above F was deceased on February 24, 1948, G, the head of the F, as the family heir, succeeded to the entire property of the said F.

After all, as a result of the G’s death on May 16, 1991, the Plaintiff, I (Death on August 23, 2014), J (Death on May 30, 1998), K, and L jointly inherited the above G’s property. The heir, including the Plaintiff (N, N, andO, who are the heir of H, K, L, and I, and I’s children) agreed on the division of inherited property (hereinafter “instant division agreement”) with the content that the instant real property should be owned solely by the Plaintiff on September 2014.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 6, and 7 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), fact-finding results against the head of the interesting Gu of this Court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. As to the first real estate in this case’s instant safety defense, the aforementioned determination is made in the forestry register and land cadastre.

arrow