logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원여주지원 2015.08.12 2014가단32894
기타(금전)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. On October 15, 2013, the Defendant obtained a new building (house) on the ground (hereinafter “instant real estate”) from Yangyang-gun, Yangyang-gun, Yangyang-gun, Yangyang-gun, the Defendant owned by the Defendant, who obtained a new building permit from the Defendant.

(Y) On October 15, 2013, Yangyang-gun sent to the Defendant a letter of notice on the processing of the building report. On October 25, 2013, the Defendant obtained from the Yangyang-gun Office approval for use of agricultural infrastructure for the purpose other than the purpose of using the building-related DNA ditches as a residential access to housing for the purpose of using the building-related DNA ditches.

(Y) On October 15, 2013, the Yangyang-gun sent to the Defendant a letter of public notice on the processing of the building building report. On the other hand, the Defendant offered the instant real estate as a substitute.

The previous years from other brokers, etc. entered E(F in the name of G real estate agent office) as the detailed information column of the instant real estate, which is an object of sale in the Internet NABC, on the Internet NABC, stating that E(F) is the road of the second line, the area adjacent to the river, the area of construction permit, the area adjacent to the river, the area of the building permit, the area of the occupation permit, the area of the first line 800 square meters, the area of the first line 2,3 km-5 square meters).

On January 2014, the Plaintiff: (a) contacted the foregoing information; (b) visited the G real estate to E to try to operate a restaurant; (c) confirmed and visited the real estate in question from the Internet that the instant real estate was sold to G real estate; and (d) requested E to intermediate the purchase of the instant real estate.

On the other hand, E made phone calls to the defendant and introduced the plaintiff.

The Plaintiff and the Defendant, under the brokerage of E on January 14, 2014, determine the purchase price of the instant real estate as KRW 300 million (the down payment of KRW 20 million on a contract, KRW 100 million on February 21, 2014, KRW 180 million on March 31, 2014, and the remainder of KRW 100 million on the remainder of March 31, 2014), and determine the special terms and conditions as “transfer of building permit certificates, total assignment of superficies on this land, and the central maximum claim amount of KRW 130 million on the remainder date.”

arrow