logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.04.22 2016고단414
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 27, 2010, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 200,000,000 to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Cheongju District Court on the ground of a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license). On November 5, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment and two years of suspended sentence, and on May 8, 2014, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 6 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) at the Cheongju District Court on the ground of a violation of the Road Traffic Act.

On January 3, 2016, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver’s license for a motor vehicle at around 15:00, driven a C Poter in the section of about 12 km from the unexponed land below the Seocho-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, and up to 95, the Defendant driven a C Poter in the section of about 12 km from the unexponed land to the 2-lane 95.

As a result, the Defendant violated it more than twice even though he was unable to drive a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, and again drive the said cargo under the influence of alcohol.

2. On January 3, 2016, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties, as set forth in paragraph 1, while driving a motor vehicle accident as of January 3, 2016. On the same day, the Defendant voluntarily accompanied the Defendant to the Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jin-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jin-gun, D around 15:30 on the same day.

Defendant is dissatisfied with the fact that he was under the influence of drinking in the above E District Office, and “Isson’s drinking driving in the absence of the victim of the accident.”

“Along with the large noise, the disturbance was avoided from F in the course of the region belonging to the said E District, and an assault was committed to the left chest of the said F on one occasion by drinking to the right side.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the control of drinking alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, on-site photograph of a traffic accident, a survey report on actual condition of a driver in charge, a report on the situation of a driver in charge, notification of the results of crackdown on drinking

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. The investigation report (CCTV image data photograph).

arrow