logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.04.07 2014나40694
대여금반환
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: (a) the part of "A cannot be excluded from the judgment of the court of first instance" which is below the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance multiplied by one day from the fifth to the second part of the judgment of the court of second instance; and (b) the part of "A witness D" which is below the second part of the judgment is the same as the statement of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding "A witness D" after "a witness C" which is at the second part of the judgment of the court

2. The part written after repair (3) The defendant asserts that the defendant made an investment of KRW 100 million and KRW 100 million and the plaintiff and C made a fire door production facility and supplied the fire door production facility to the manufacturing company. The defendant alleged that the production facility of the fire doors was divided by C, and the related electrical control team was actually manufactured by two punchers, the defendant actually produced two punchers, and supplied the electric control team to F and G, which is the manufacturing company of the fire doors, in case where C produces two punchers and supplies the electric control team to the director E, which is the manufacturing company of the fire doors.

3. If so, the decision of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and thus, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

arrow