Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 26, 2012, around 15:15, the Defendant causing property damage: (a) found in the sampling c apartment 802-2-2002-dong 2002-dong, Yeonsu-gu Incheon, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, “Gu around 44 years of age”; (b) did not receive construction cost; (c) removed the cover of the glass decoration installed therein from the front line to the front line; and (d) removed the cover of the glass decoration installed therein; and (d) removed the front line from the front line to the front line; and (e) removed the front line from the front line to the front line; (e) removed the front line with the front line with the front line with the front line with the front line with the front line with the front line with the front line with the front line with the front line with the front line with the front line with the front line with the front line with the front line with the front line with the front line with the front line with the front line with the front line with the view of 30.

2. The Defendant interfered with the business by force, such as cutting away a decoration, etc., which is a glass product, among the interiors installed in a sampling site, which is a “Guing house,” at the same time and at the same place as the above paragraph (1), thereby obstructing the victim’s duties under the above paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged on the spot;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and selection of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the provisional payment order is to take into account the background leading to the instant crime, degree of damage, etc.