1. The defendant shall not manufacture, use or transfer the products listed in the Attachment No. 2.

2. The defendant's factory and the defendant's factory.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff’s patented invention is a patent holder of the same patented invention as follows (hereinafter “instant patented invention”) with the trade name of “C”, who is engaged in the business of manufacturing leisure mother and child.

1) The title of the invention: The date of application for the tea for the mother and child who has improved functionality 2) / the date of registration / the registration number: D/E/F3) claims and the patent invention of this case as indicated in attached Table 1 to the main drawings. B. The Defendant’s product is the product listed in attached Table 2 (hereinafter “Defendant’s product”) by a person who engages in mother and child manufacturing in the trade name of “G”

(C) Prior inventions 1) The prior inventions are related to the “vegetable baby,” published in the Japanese Patent Gazette H, published on August 31, 2006, which was published on August 31, 2006, and the representative drawing is as follows. The representative drawing is as to the “vegetable baby with auxiliary quantity,” published in the Registration Patent Gazette (No. 7, the number I, the number I) of the Korean Intellectual Property Office on March 3, 2006. The main drawing is as follows: (c) the prior inventions 3) the prior inventions 3) the prior inventions 3) the prior inventions 3) the shape of the “vegetable baby,” published in the Registration Gazette (No. 7, the number I, the number I, the number I, and the number I, the number I, set as follows.

D. The Plaintiff filed a complaint against the Defendant on the charge of infringing the instant patented invention. The Defendant received a summary order of KRW 3,00,000,000 from December 18, 2015 (Seoul District Court Branch Branch Decision 2015Da7752). The gist of criminal facts against the Defendant is that “the Defendant produced more than 170,000,000,000,000,000,00 won, which was issued by the Defendant.” The summary of criminal facts against the Defendant is that “the Defendant infringed on the mother-child tea (K registration number) that was a patentee on February 2, 2015, and produced more than 170,000,000,000,000,000.”