logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.06.15 2015가단235212
근저당권말소
Text

1. As to the Plaintiff’s share of 1/3 of F Forest land 26,479 square meters in Kimhae-si:

A. Defendant C is the Changwon District Court.

Reasons

1. The following facts can be acknowledged in light of the following facts: there is no dispute between the parties, or the whole purport of the pleadings in the statement Nos. 1 and 2.

A As to the share of 1/3 of the 26,479 square meters out of the 26,000 square meters of the 26,479 square meters of the Kimhae-si, the Changwon District Court Kimhae-si Office of 86959 on October 15, 2003 (hereinafter “the maximum debt amount of 50,000,000 won due to the mortgage contract as of October 14, 2003 (hereinafter “the creation registration of the 1st mortgage”) and the establishment registration of the 50,000 won of the maximum debt amount due to the mortgage contract as of October 14, 2003 (hereinafter “the creation registration of the 1st mortgage”) and the defendant Eul received the establishment registration of the 1,00,000 won of the 1,00,000 won of the maximum debt amount due to the mortgage contract as of May 18, 2005 (hereinafter “the establishment registration of the 2nd mortgage”) and each of the 3638,6,20008.6.

B. On May 15, 2015, A was declared bankrupt by Busan District Court 2014Hadan2052, and the Plaintiff was appointed as a trustee in bankruptcy on the same day.

2. According to the facts of the above recognition, the secured claim of the registration of the establishment of the creation of the first class mortgage of this case on October 14, 2003, which is the date of the contract, and the secured claim of the registration of the establishment of the establishment of the second class mortgage of this case on May 18, 2005, which is the date of the contract. The secured claim of the establishment of the establishment of the second class mortgage of this case on June 28, 2005, which is the date of the contract, was the date of the contract, and it is apparent that ten years have passed thereafter. Thus, the secured claim of the first, second, and third class mortgage of this case was all extinguished by the completion of the contract.

I would like to say.

Therefore, the Defendants, who are the right to collateral security, are obligated to implement the registration procedure for cancellation of the registration of the establishment of each of the instant real estate completed to the Plaintiff.

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff.

arrow