1. The sentence against the accused shall be 1,000,000 won;

2. The defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant reported the marriage with B around October 2013, but became aware of the relationship between B and the victim C. On January 2017, the victim C was divorced by agreement. From around 2000, the victim C had been in the relationship between B and the victim.

Even after the defendant was divorced with B, the victim sent a text message to himself/herself as the problem B.

The defect caused the following crimes.

1. No person who violates the Act on the Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, etc. shall allow any other person to repeatedly reach any code, language, or image that arouses fear or apprehension through an information and communications network;

On August 23, 2017, from around 11:58 to 21:22 on the same day, the Defendant used his own mobile phone from the victim’s cell phone to the victim’s cell phone using his own mobile phone “it is necessary for this son, even though he was given a warning of his internal organ, to have his own cell phone cut off, and to communicate with his own son,” and

I explained clearly that the continuing space is now coming to the present house, and I would like to see the value of the KCA as the method from the present moment, disregarding this warning.

N. N.N. Erroring the police and, in particular, considering N.N. Doz. further:

In addition, the text that arouses uneasiness through information and communications networks has reached victims repeatedly, such as transmitting text messages stating that the comments would be harshly humping, as shown in the list of crimes in attached Form 84 times.

2. On August 24, 2017, at around 09:13, the Defendant intrusiond with a residence: (a) another resident was in front of the entrance of the building E, Gunsan-si, the victim’s residence; (b) opened a door by dividing the password, and entered the door; and (c) opened up the door to the front door of the victim’s residence; and (d) opened the door to the front door of the victim’s residence through the elevator and opened the door without the victim’s opening the door; and (c) opened the door, the Defendant was able to open the door.