1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On April 20, 2010, the Plaintiff entered the Army and discharged the Plaintiff from military service on February 15, 2012.

나. 원고는, 군복무 중 다른 부대에서 제초작업을 마치고 트럭을 타고 복귀하던 중 트럭이 가로수를 밀고 나가면서 튕겨져 나온 가로수 나뭇가지에 오른쪽 안구를 맞아 다쳤다

(hereinafter “instant accident”) caused the Defendant to have rendered distinguished services to the State, and the Defendant’s veterans review conference recognized on August 7, 2012 as constituting an injury-free requirement on the Yellow Maule’s Republic of Korea. However, on the subsequent physical examination and review conducted, the lower grade standard was determined as below.

C. On March 4, 2016, the Plaintiff again filed an application for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State on the ground that “Seong-gu So-gu So-gu So-called So-called So-called So-called So-youngs” was the same.

On August 8, 2016, the Defendant: (a) determined that the Plaintiff was not eligible for veteran’s compensation under the Act on the Support for Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State (amended by Act No. 11041, Sept. 15, 201; hereinafter “Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State”) because the Plaintiff was not deemed to have suffered from the instant injury while performing his/her duties or education and training directly related to the national security, etc.; (b) determined that the Plaintiff was not eligible for veteran’s compensation under the Act on the Support for Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State (hereinafter “the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State”).

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, 2 and 3

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1 pertains to the honorable treatment and support of the former person of distinguished service to the State, etc., who was in force on November 10, 201, pursuant to the principle of non-performance of law.