1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

1. AD AB E-C of basic facts;

A. On February 7, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a music record agreement with the Defendant with the following content (hereinafter “this contract”).

B. The details that the Plaintiff and the Defendant remitted to each other’s account from February 9, 2013 to November 8, 2013 are as listed below:

(3) Of the instant table 0. 0. 1, the part that the Plaintiff remitted to the Defendant on 2. 0. 0. 0, 00, 00. 14, 0. 0, 00, 00, 000 on 18. 1, 2013, 00, 00, 00 on 14. 0, 00, 00 on 14. 0, 00, 00, 00 on 14. 2, 0, 00 on 14, 20, 00 on 14, 200, 00 on 14, 00, 00 on 14, 00 on 15, 200, 00 on 15, 200, 300, 003 on 24, 000, 00 on 203, 2013

C. On January 23, 2015, the Defendant sent each voice message stating that “Around November 22, 2013, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million to the victim’s cell phone with the victim’s cell phone with the victim’s cell phone with the victim’s mobile phone with the victim’s mobile phone with the victim’s mobile phone with the victim’s mobile phone with the victim’s mobile phone at around 07:10 on the same day, “Around 07:10 on the same day, I am or know that I would am in the process of making I I I I am, but I am in the form of so I am am or I am am, and I am am in the front of his house, and I would now be waiting before his house.” As a crime of intimidation with the content of criminal facts, the said summary order was finalized as it is.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 2, 3, Eul evidence 2, Eul evidence 14-3, 15, and 16 (which contain each number number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The argument and judgment.