logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.11.30 2015구단8247
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. Plaintiff A (hereinafter “Plaintiff A”) is a foreigner of the nationality of the Republic of Ghana (hereinafter “A”), and the rest of the Plaintiffs are U.B.

A foreigner of the Republic of Korea (hereinafter referred to as “C-3”)’s nationality entered and staying in the Republic of Korea on May 15, 2013 as a short-term visit (C-3), and filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant on June 13, 2013, which was before the expiration of the period of stay ( June 14, 2013).

B. On April 25, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiffs do not constitute a case of “a well-founded fear that would be subject to persecution” as a requirement of refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees.

[Basis] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 4, Gap evidence 2-1 to 4, Eul evidence 1-1 to 4, Eul evidence 2-1 to 2-4, Eul evidence 2-1 to 4, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiffs Gap asserted that the plaintiff A is well-known.

person shall be U.S.

The plaintiff B (hereinafter referred to as the "Plaintiff B") is the wife of the plaintiff, and the remaining plaintiffs are the children born between the plaintiff A and the plaintiff B.

Plaintiff

A joined ADF (ADF) as an anti-military organization, and it did not inform the plaintiff B of his or her activities in detail, considering that the plaintiff B would have been divorced if he or she became aware of the fact, and therefore, the plaintiff B knew the plaintiff's occupation as a piping hole only.

Plaintiff

A has returned to the South Africa Republic from around 1999 to 2002, and is well-known after having returned to the Republic of South Africa.

The escape from detention to the authorities, followed by the plaintiff Eul, who is the seat of the plaintiff A, or with a forged passport of nationality, is concealed in the flight space, and the seat number is received from the crew.

arrow