The defendant shall be innocent.

1. No person who manages or has processed the summary of the facts charged shall divulge personal information that he/she learned in the course of performing his/her duties or provide it to another person without authority;

On May 13, 2015, the Defendant sent to E an application for remedy, such as unfair dismissal, in which personal information, such as D’s name, date of birth, contact, address, etc., is included, at the office of the main business of the Korean Veterans Association, and at the office of the Korean Veterans Association, at around May 13, 2015, at D’s meeting of the members of the members of the members of the members of the members of the members of the members of the members of the members of the members of the members of the members of the members of the members of the members of the members of the members of the members of the members of the members of the members of the members of the North Korean Labor Association requested to submit written answers related to D’s application for reinstatement.

Accordingly, the defendant disclosed personal information that he became aware of in the course of his duties to E.

2. Determination

A. The former Act on the Protection of Personal Information of Public Institutions (amended by Act No. 10465, Mar. 29, 201) provides that an act of using personal information for unjust purposes, such as leakage of personal information, processing without authority, provision of personal information for another person’s use, etc. (Articles 23(2) and 11). Here, “public opinion” refers to any act of notifying another person who has yet to be aware of such act (see Supreme Court Decision 2013Do13070, Jul. 9, 2015). Article 59 Subparag. 2 of the Personal Information Protection Act is the same.

B. The following facts are acknowledged according to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court.

1) On May 12, 2015, D accepted an application for remedy, such as unfair dismissal, with the purport that D’s cleaning team’s cleaning team’s cleaning team’s cleaning team’s cleaning team’s cleaning team’s demotion was unfair and unfair. Thus, D’s cleaning team’s cleaning team’s cleaning team’s cleaning team’s demotion was accepted.

2) On May 13, 2015, the Gyeongbuk Regional Labor Relations Commission shall submit to the General Business Headquarters of the Korean Veterans Association a written response to the application for remedy.