logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.07.02 2013고단6151
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 30, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 8 months at the Suwon District Court for fraud, etc. on August 30, 201, and on February 23, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 4 months for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act at the 51st Military Court at the Army on February 23, 201, and completed the execution of the sentence on January 19, 20

[2013 Highest 6151]

1. The Defendant and B conspired to purchase a mobile phone by forging the application form for the purchase of a mobile phone in the name of C, and sell the mobile phone at the intermittent value of the mobile phone. A.

Around 14:00 on May 13, 2013, the Defendant and B drafted two copies of the application form for the purchase of a mobile phone at the mobile phone store in Suwon-gu Dtel 101, the Defendant and B signed the document forgery (1) as “C” on May 13, 2013, stating that “C: the name of customer: E, resident registration number: E, address: F, 208 Dong 1307, the date of application: May 14, 2013; and the applicant: C: (a) signed the “C” on the back of the name of C, and (b) the C’s resident registration certificate, which was previously stamped by the Handphone, was sent to the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant and B forged the two copies of the application form of entry in the name of C on rights and obligations for the purpose of exercising.

(2) At around 15:50 on May 20, 2013, the Defendant and B forged two copies of the application form in the name of C concerning rights and obligations in the same manner as above at the same place as above.

B. The Defendant and B exercised the instant investigation document as if they were duly formed two copies of the application for forgery as above with respect to G workers in mobile phone stores who are aware of the forgery at the same time and at the same place as the above-mentioned paragraph (1).

(2) The Defendant and B exercised as if they were duly formed two copies of the forged application form with respect to cell phone store G, who did not know that the forgery was made at the same time and at the same place as the above-mentioned paragraph (2).

C. (1) The Defendant and B are time and time as referred to in paragraph (1) above.

arrow