(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.13 2014가단5277353

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.13 2014가단5277353

건물명도

Text

1. The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) indicated on the separate sheet No. 1, 2, 3, and 3 among the three floors of the building indicated in the separate sheet.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. A. A lease agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant (hereinafter “each of the instant lease agreements”) 1) on April 30, 2013 between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, the Plaintiff owned by himself and the Defendant on April 30, 2013, and the building of the steel bars, bricks, and apap 4 (hereinafter “instant building”).

(2) On May 2013, the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed that the lease contract was automatically extended to one year prior to the expiration of the contract period of 10,000 won for the lease deposit of 15,00,000 won for the lease deposit of 1,5,000 won for the monthly rent of 1,80,000 won for the lease from May 1, 2013 to April 30, 2014. The Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed that the lease contract was automatically extended to 10,000 won for the lease of 20,000 won for the lease contract of 1,50,000 won for the lease between the Defendant and C (2,000 won for the lease contract of 1,50,000 won for the lease contract of 20,000 won for the previous 1,000 won for the lease contract of 30,000 won for the lease contract of this case between the Defendant and C.

B. Around August 13, 2014, the Plaintiff’s notice of termination was issued to the Defendant by content-certified mail (i.e., the monthly rent for each object of lease of this case). As such, the Plaintiff’s notice of termination was delayed for at least six (6) months, it should be immediately paid within one week. (ii) If the Defendant did not pay the entire overdue rent, the Plaintiff terminated each of the instant lease agreement and requested the Defendant to immediately issue an order to the Plaintiff. The content-certified mail reached the Defendant on August 14, 2014

C. However, around August 13, 2014, the Plaintiff sent content-certified mail to the Defendant, as above, the overdue rent under each of the instant lease agreements between February 1, 2014 and July 2014 is only 1,782.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.11 2016가단5056536

-서울동부지방법원 2016.01.15 2015가단110493

-대구지방법원서부지원 2016.06.15 2015가단37379

-부산지방법원동부지원 2016.04.21 2015가단205415

-창원지방법원 2017.10.12 2016가단9455